K.I.S.S.

by harvey4bcc Email

K.I.S.S.

What does this little acronym mean? Back in my military days;
it went something like this: Keep It Simple Stupid. I know we aren’t supposed to use the word stupid anymore, but if it is apt to the situation then I don’t see the problem.
In the county commission meeting I attended on February 18th the Chairman admitted he had begun to realize how little he knew and understood of what former finance director Dave Bennett and
bond agent Ayers of Regions Financial had informed the commission of with regards to the county budget for the last few years. Finance is complicated, especially when you get into derivatives, and rate swaps,
and on demand bonds. I’m not saying I understand it either. I’m saying that up front. Jim Folts has helped some, but I still have much to learn.
If something is so complicated that you can’t understand it, then don’t vote to approve it. At the very least get someone who can explain it to you before you do! There are a lot of things in contracts that I haven’t understood when it came to financing my home or my vehicles. I have had someone explain them to me. I ask about early payoff penalties or transfer fees. I want to know what something is going to cost me before I ever sign on the dotted line because I am the one who is going to have to make the payments. It appears these things were never done with a majority of the financial decisions of the current commission.
Can we do better? This is a valid question when you realize the amount of debt the county has, and that a 46.5 million dollar payment is due next year. Using information provided by The Daily Times, I have been enlightened to the fact that the county has over 61 million dollars of payments due next year on a budget of just over 40 million in the general fund. Something must be done.
We could all pay an extra $5000 of property tax next year. I haven’t found anyone who is willing to do so. Most people I’ve spoken to don’t have the means to do so. One suggestion I have is to pay out a five year bond at 5% fixed interest sold through the local banks. That is a better yield than thousands of people in our county can get on a five year fixed CD (Certificate of Deposit). Another suggestion is figuring out where we can cut waste out of our spending. Some departments of county government do an excellent job overseeing the funds they use. Some do not. In addition, nonprofit entities in the
county should not be funded with taxpayer money.
Due to the contracts currently signed, and the legalities of their binding, I do not know for sure what can be done. I would like to see Dave Bennett and Regions Financial held liable for the poor advice they have given the county in the last four years. I am interested in hearing what plans the new financial director has for reigning in the excessive spending of the current administration. I would like all of it in simple and specific terms.
Keep It Simple Studiously. When I was in public speaking class I was taught there are three parts to a speech. Tell them what you are going to tell them, tell them, and then tell them what you told them. I want all of the citizens of Blount County to understand how we are going to get out of the mess this administration has created. The interest and fees we are paying each year could be better used in a variety of manners in this county.
Speaking of questionable financing, I would like to see the 8 million dollar shortfall from the education budget in the past four years returned to it. While we now have an 11 million surplus in the general fund, I don’t think education should have been robbed to
accomplish this.
I urge everyone reading this to take a serious look at your candidates, their motives, and what they have accomplished in the past four years, positively, or negatively, then decide whom you will support in the upcoming primary.

Jerry L. Harvey Candidate District 4 Seat A

15 comments

Comment from: andy [Member]
At least the chairman admitted he didn't know. The rest of them just didn't care!
03/07/10 @ 18:27
Comment from: mello [Member]
Andy- most of them admitted they did not care last May when they refused to even consider Reeves' resolution to review and set a debt policy!
03/07/10 @ 19:54
Comment from: Arabic Numerals [Visitor] · http://www.emuni.com/
Cutting public services, severe municipal conservation methods (selling off useless SUVs, Gasoline Cards, etc.), raising property taxes, introduce progressive property taxes--based on income and age, and introducing GVW impact fees; or a combination of all of these will take us over the hump.

Bad part: all non-incumbents elected will be blamed for the repair of a wound, inflicted by a prior administration. Sound familiar?
03/07/10 @ 23:32
Comment from: KPA [Member] Email
raising property taxes, introduce progressive property taxes--based on income and age, and introducing GVW impact fees

Before the Tale of Two Counties a few years ago, citizens maybe could wonder where all money is going. After viewing the presentation, there should be no wondering; http://www.blounttn.net/twocounties.pdf

Washington County is Johnson City and Sullivan is Kingsport. These aren't impoverished areas.

Before anyone in government goes looking externally for money, they first should look internally. Really, just look down. Blount government is sitting on a huge pile of tax dollar waste. Like Newt said, the next bubble is government. Currently, government is the only sector with jobs growth. Government is funded by the private sector, which has a money pool that's shrinking. The simple equation is - either the bubble pops, or we go broke. But only those inside the bubble can burst it. And that assumes those in charge recognize what Gringrich and most taxpaying citizens do.
03/08/10 @ 09:20
Comment from: Arabic Numerals [Visitor] · http://www.emuni.com/
Are you against GVW impact fees? Maybe you're right. Toll booths are much better--they ensure that roller skate versus double-king-cabbed-duelly-wheeled-saudi-friend pays the exact same for the use and destruction of our roads. We wouldn't want to be discriminatory.
03/08/10 @ 12:54
Comment from: KPA [Member] Email
GVW impact fees

I'm for looking inward before looking outward. If no waste is recognized, why should taxpayers be forced to fund more waste?
03/08/10 @ 14:15
It goes back to what has been in several other posts by a variety of people. Let's identify what we need, and let go of what we want, (like $60k SUV's for some officials). Several times fleet service has been killed in committee before being considered, and an external audit of each department to find waste would be welcomed by most taxpayers. I think the departments that are doing an excellent job wouldn't mind it too much, we would hear the loudest protest from those that do waste a great deal.
I guess I'm saying, if you look at where taxpayer money is being spent, you can find areas to cut back and to reduce waste. When we take care of the county debt we can revisit those grants and services that were cut.
03/08/10 @ 15:43
Jerry, I ain't trying to bend your thread, just wondering how the fools on the hill (local and state) will handle it, when the giant carnivorous monster standing on the horizon, lowers his head and tears down the street? Again!

It's very nice to cut extravagant spending, but when we continue to spend down avenues ...

(some consider neccessary) http://www.wate.com/Global/story.asp?S=12087913

... that have absolutely no future of funding, we can wait until it's a big mean nasty problem with a bunch of "Oh, Noes" or we could head it off at the pass and give the county something to be proud of:

http://www.statesman.com/news/texas/austin-considering-light-rail-streetcar-line-225416.html
03/08/10 @ 16:27
Here's my deal, when gas was 4.50 a gal I started driving less and cutting back on other things because I had to have a certain amount of gas to get back and forth to work. Now gas is 2.50 to 3.00 a gal, but guess what, I'm not driving any more than when it was 4.50. There are certain things I have changed because they were luxuries in my life. There are certain luxuries the county could do without, and some things they must have. Let's get the things we need, and quit paying for things we don't.
03/08/10 @ 18:00
Comment from: james [Member] Email
remember to vote May 4th primary.
03/08/10 @ 20:51
Comment from: Linda King [Visitor]
I attended the Budget Meeting tonight. Would you believe that one of the Items consisted of giving a RAISE to the office managers in the Codes/Building/Stormwater Depts? They stated that we have extra money from a position that had remained unfilled. Can you believe that while, all across our county and state, people are losing their jobs and homes, our Commission is still handing out raises? I know that everyone likes to get a raise, but let's consider the economic times we're in-----at least they have a job. And, from what is reported, there is less building going on in Blount County which should mean less work for these employees------less permits and paperwork.

I got up and stated that if we have extra money, it should be used to pay down our quarter billion dollar debt!!!
03/08/10 @ 21:48
Comment from: KPA [Member] Email
I've heard in the Courthouse in front of the full commission, on more than one occasion, tax revenue is down. Help me understand - how can we keep offering to let more go out, when less is coming in?
03/09/10 @ 00:16
Comment from: Missy [Visitor]
Today at 5 at Roger Field's office is a meeting of the Blount County Construction Appeals Board. Who is on this Board and when do they regularly meet? Could one of the County Commissioners who read this blog please find out and post. Thank you.
03/09/10 @ 00:43
Comment from: Derick Jones [Visitor] · http://www.u-2-me.com/
I have to agree with Linda King. That debt needs to be addressed more effectively now. Before things spiral out of control. Thanks for a well-written post and providing a platform to discuss this. Good to learn about this blog.
07/07/10 @ 09:53
Comment from: weeping willow [Member] Email
Mello, Let's go back in time about your comment "most of them admitted they did not care last May when they refused to even consider Reeves' resolution to review and set a debt policy!" The year before McCulley questioned Dave Bennett at one of the Commission meetings about the very same issue. The issue of debt struction and variable rates had never been raised before that I can remember. If I recall correctly, McCulley asked Bennett why the county had loans that had variable rates instead of fixed rates. (If you are buying a home, none of us want to get into a variable rate loan. It can increase every time interest rates go up.) Since none of the other commissioners knew anything about finance, I guess, they didn't jump in to help. They just left him hanging. Reeves is a great commissioner. She researches and learns about the issues, but I have heard her comment several times that she doesn't fully understand the financial end of county business. Only when it became an issue that most could understand, then the commissioners started to discuss the variable rate on loans. We have people elected to county commission that know nothing about investment and finance. When I read Joe McCulley's qualifications and experience, it makes me sick that he was not placed on committees that made a difference like the BUDGET committee. Wonder why they didn't want him or David Ballard on that committee?
07/07/10 @ 11:37

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)